/* wp.networksolution.net.bd theme functions */ /* wp.networksolution.net.bd theme functions */ {"id":19545,"date":"2024-02-28T12:19:49","date_gmt":"2024-02-28T12:19:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp.networksolution.net.bd\/?p=19545"},"modified":"2024-11-28T09:27:00","modified_gmt":"2024-11-28T09:27:00","slug":"how-well-does-ai-translation-handle-creative","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wp.networksolution.net.bd\/?p=19545","title":{"rendered":"How Well Does AI Translation Handle Creative Content?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Statistical learning beyond words in human neonates<\/h1>\n<\/p>\n

\"semantic<\/p>\n

The Structured streams were created by concatenating the tokens in such a way that they resulted in a semi-random concatenation of the duplets (i.e., pseudo-words) formed by one of the features (syllable\/voice) while the other feature (voice\/syllable) vary semi-randomly. In other words, in Experiment 1, the order of the tokens was such that Transitional Probabilities (TPs) between syllables alternated between 1 (within duplets) and 0.5 (between duplets), while between voices, TPs were uniformly 0.2. The design was orthogonal for the Structured streams of Experiment 2 (i.e., TPs between voices alternated between 1 and 0.5, while between syllables were evenly 0.2). The random streams were created by semi-randomly concatenating the 36 tokens to achieve uniform TPs equal to 0.2 over both features. The semi-random concatenation implied that the same element could not appear twice in a row, and the same two elements could not repeatedly alternate more than two times (i.e., the sequence XkXjXkXj, where Xk and Xj are two elements, was forbidden). Notice that with an element, we refer to a duplet when it concerns the choice of the structured feature and to the identity of the second feature when it involves the other feature.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n